Loading
Latest News |
(See all)

CU In The News

DAILY CALLER: GOP Senators Urge McConnell To Block Massive Spending Package

Four Senate Republicans on Wednesday urged Mitch McConnell to block an omnibus spending package to fund the government for next year and, instead, push for a continuing resolution (C.R.) to give the GOP more negotiating leverage with a House majority in the next Congress.

Congressional leaders of both parties are currently negotiating a permanent appropriations bill to fund the federal government for the 2022-23 Fiscal Year, with the government currently being funded by a previous continuing resolution that runs to Dec. 16. The four senators said in their letter that they will “not accept anything less” than a C.R., heralding a potential filibuster.

“I’m completely against negotiating with Nancy Pelosi,” said Republican Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana to the DCNF on Wednesday, stating that he and colleagues would work to ensure an omnibus does not pass before the year’s end. Braun was joined by Republican Sens. Rick Scott of Florida, Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah in the letter calling for a C.R. to “avert a government shutdown and take us up to the House being sworn in on Jan. 3.”

“We believe it would be both imprudent, and a reflection of poor leadership, for Republicans to ignore the will of the American people and rubber stamp an omnibus spending bill that funds ten more months of President Biden’s agenda,” the letter read.



The comments from GOP members appear to contrast with those of Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, who has voiced his preference for an omnibus resolution before the year’s end rather than another continuing resolution.

“I think there’s widespread agreement that we’d be better off with an omnibus than a [continuing resolution],” McConnell said at the White House on Tuesday, after negotiating with President Joe Biden on the subject.

In an appearance on Newsmax on Wednesday, Cruz rejected McConnell’s approach.

“Why on earth would we pass Nancy Pelosi’s omnibus bill when, in just a few weeks, we’re going to have a Republican House?” adding that “the Republican leadership in the Senate is trying to emasculate the incoming GOP House majority.”

There is a considerable division within the Senate GOP Conference on the approach, however.

“This is a miserable way and, frankly, an embarrassing way for Congress to do business, and it is potentially dangerous, too,” Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said to the DCNF, suggesting that national security may be risked with a C.R.

Were Senate Democrats to bring an omnibus bill to the Senate floor, it would require at least 10 Republican votes in order to overcome a filibuster, assuming all Democrats vote in favor. If neither an omnibus bill nor a C.R. pass, there will be a government shutdown on Dec. 17, the first of Biden’s presidency.

McConnell and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s offices did not respond to a request for comment.


LAW 360: Citizens United Asks High Court To Can ICE Curbs

Conservative nonprofit Citizens United has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Biden administration guidance narrowing deportations to national security threats and other "priority" immigrants, alleging the policy was part of a scheme to open the nation's borders.

Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation and the Republican-oriented Presidential Coalition LLC pressed the high court to view the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's September 2021 guidance in light of President Joe Biden's other immigration policies, including his repeal of the national emergency declaration allowing defense funding to be used to construct a border wall and his termination of the "Remain in Mexico" policy requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico while their claims for protection are processed. These policies show that the Biden administration is attempting to frustrate immigration enforcement and "throw" the borders open, they said.

"As with other Biden immigration 'reforms,' the Final Memorandum was implemented not because [DHS Secretary Alejandro] Mayorkas had scarce resources or different enforcement priorities from the prior administration, but because he and President Biden have been working hard to maximize open borders by minimizing enforcement of our nation's immigration laws," they said in an amici brief filed Oct. 25.

The disputed guidance marks the Biden administration's most recent effort to focus immigration arrests and deportations on recent border-crossers and immigrants deemed to pose a national security or public safety risk — a change from immigration enforcement under former President Donald Trump, who pushed to target nearly all unauthorized immigrants for removal. There are roughly 11 million unauthorized immigrants in the U.S., and DHS lacks the resources to go after all of them, Mayorkas has said.

The memo has been deeply criticized by Texas and Louisiana, which filed suit seeking to strike it down. U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton ultimately vacated the guidance in June, agreeing with the states that the administration had violated its obligations under the Immigration and Nationality Act's Sections 1226(c) and 1231(a) to detain noncitizens with serious criminal convictions or final deportation orders.

The Fifth Circuit has blessed Judge Tipton's ruling. But the Sixth Circuit, while reviewing a separate, similar legal challenge, upheld the guidance, saying it "merely" told employees what to prioritize.

In their Oct. 25 amici brief, the conservative organizations referred to Judge Tipton's ruling, saying that the Immigration and Nationality Act imposed a "blanket rule" that DHS was violating. Nineteen Republican states, led by Arizona, also came out in support of Texas and Louisiana the same day.

The Arizona-led states coalition argued that the September 2021 memo was "functionally identical" to interim guidance released in February 2021 that they said led to a reduction in removals. If the Supreme Court allows the memo to go into effect, it would force them to cover the health care, public safety and education costs of a population that would otherwise be detained, the states said.

However, New York, California and more than a dozen other Democratic-led jurisdictions have defended the memo in their own filing to the Supreme Court, saying the broader context of the immigration act "makes clear" that Sections 1226(c) and 1231(a) don't impose mandatory detention obligations. Interpreting those provisions otherwise would intrude on the Executive Branch's broad discretion over immigration enforcement, they said.

They further argued that the Supreme Court risked letting immigration officers make "unprincipled" and "random" enforcement actions that could threaten the stability of the states' immigrant communities if the justices nixed the guidelines.

"Immigrants add billions to federal, state, and local budgets by paying taxes and spending their income. Amici thus have a significant interest in supporting the federal government's judgment to devote its limited immigration enforcement resources toward the subset of removable immigrants who pose a substantial threat to public safety in their communities," they said.

Representatives for Citizens United and the federal government did not respond to requests for comment Monday.

Citizens United is represented in-house by Michael Boos and Daniel Jorjani and by William Olson, Jeremiah Morgan and Robert Olson of William J. Olson PC and Rick Boyer of the Integrity Law Firm.

The federal government is represented by Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Louisiana is represented by Elizabeth B. Murrill and Joseph S. St. John of the Louisiana Department of Justice.

Texas is represented by Judd E. Stone, Lanora C. Pettit and Benjamin D. Wilson of the Office of the Texas Attorney General.

The case is U.S. et al. v. Texas et al., case number 22-58, in the U.S. Supreme Court.


THE DAILY SIGNAL: Congressmen, Conservative Groups Defend Eagle Forum From Justice Department’s ‘Chilling’ Subpoena

All six Republicans representing Alabama in the U.S. House signed on to a legal brief opposing the Justice Department’s broad subpoena of records from a small conservative group in their state, Eagle Forum of Alabama. 

The friend of the court brief, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, also includes six Alabama state legislators and more than 50 organizations, most of them conservative.

Among those groups: Judicial Watch, Citizens United, Concerned Women for America, the Faith and Freedom Coalition, the Foundation for Government Accountability, the Manhattan Institute, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, and the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

The Daily Signal reported Sept. 12 that the Justice Department is seeking documents from Eagle Forum of Alabama going back five years as part of a lawsuit challenging an Alabama law that prohibits sex-change treatments for minors.

The GOP members of Alabama’s U.S. House delegation opposing the Justice Department’s action against Eagle Forum are Reps. Robert Aderholt, Mo Brooks, Jerry Carl, Barry Moore, Gary Palmer, and Mike Rogers. (Rep. Terri Sewell, Alabama’s seventh representative, is a Democrat.)

The six House Republicans from Alabama also sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland on Wednesday, asking him to explain the Justice Department’s constitutional authority for pursuing documents from Eagle Forum and to show that the agency is not acting in an arbitrary, political manner.

“Eagle Forum of Alabama is an outstanding organization that represents the values of thousands of Alabamians. To have their First Amendment rights infringed upon by the Department of Justice is disrespectful to our Constitution,” Palmer, chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee, said in a prepared statement, adding:

"Constitutional protections should not be dictated by the political views of individuals in the White House or their appointee. Attorney General Merrick Garland owes an explanation for the motives behind this aggressive action against an organization simply petitioning the government on an issue important to them."

Earlier this year, the Biden Justice Department sued the state of Alabama over the law against sex-change surgery and other medical treatment for minors. In August, the department subpoenaed documents from Eagle Forum of Alabama—which isn’t a party to the court case—regarding its interactions with lawmakers and other advocacy.

Individuals who signed on to the court brief include Hans von Spakovsky, a former Justice Department attorney who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, parent organization of The Daily Signal.

“This is an outrageous attempt by the Justice Department to try to intimidate citizens engaging in everyday, routine activity on issues important to them,” von Spakovsky told The Daily Signal. “The reason the Justice Department is doing this is because this is a particular view they want to silence.”

The friend of the court brief calls the Justice Department subpoena of Eagle Forum a “transparent and flagrant violation of the First Amendment.”

The friend of the court, or amici curiae, brief reads in part:

"Amici comprise a wide range of organizations and individuals, from nonprofit policy groups, to federal and state legislators, to individual citizens. Their interests and goals vary. But all agree that the United States’ subpoena in this case is a transparent use of the civil litigation process to chill the speech and political organizing of those who hold views contrary to those of the United States and the Department of Justice.

The subpoena harms not just members of the public across all ideological and political spectra, who will be inhibited from open discourse and petitioning, but also legislators themselves, who benefit from hearing from their constituents without those citizens fearing subsequent federal investigations seeking reams of protected materials."

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to The Daily Signal’s inquiries for this report.

“The department is full of radical bureaucrats and has even been sanctioned by federal courts for colluding with leftist groups,” J. Christian Adams, president of Public Interest Legal Foundation, said in a public statement. “In America, the government cannot target groups who oppose their political beliefs and that is exactly what the DOJ has done here.”

A weaponized Justice Department is targeting political enemies of the Biden administration, said Tarren Bragdon, president of the Foundation for Government Accountability.

“The Biden administration has launched an intimidation campaign against a small nonprofit group that has only one full-time employee,” Bragdon said in a public statement defending Eagle Forum of Alabama. “This is an effort to force the organization to exhaust its limited resources defending itself against the full force of the federal government.”


FOX BUSINESS: US back to ‘Jimmy Carter economic policies’ as inflation rages, David Bossie says

During his appearance on "Varney & Co." Thursday, Citizens United President David Bossie sounded the alarm on the inflation woes plaguing Americans, arguing the country is back to "Jimmy Carter economic policies" due to Biden's agenda. 

DAVID BOSSIE: We're going to see high, high unemployment. We're going to see interest rates for a very long time go up. And that's the pain that Powell was talking about, or we're going to see this incredible recession. And I think we're going to see a little bit of both. We're back to Jimmy Carter economic policies.

We're back to Jimmy Carter in numbers. And this is going to be a long time, we're going to see this for several years to come. And if we don't get it corrected this November, you know, with the with a policy change in the House of Representatives, we're going to be in this for a very, very long time.

WATCH THE FULL INTERVIEW BELOW:


Citizens United President David Bossie on Fox Business

Citizens United President David Bossie on Fox Business


DAVID BOSSIE ON THE SARA CARTER PODCAST

Citizens United President David Bossie joins Sara to discuss the approaching midterm elections and the challenges and opportunities facing the Republican Party. Bossie explains that the media will focus more on President Trump than President Biden over these final weeks because focusing on the Biden record would hurt the Democrats - whom most reporters support.

They also discuss what message the GOP should be focused on over these final two months, why the skyrocketing rate of violent crime needs to be front and center and whether Trump will actually run again in 2024.


FOX NEWS: DAVID BOSSIE: Republicans shouldn't be distracted by Biden's political rhetoric

David Bossie, deputy manager for Trump's 2016 campaign, says President Biden's latest speech was one of the most mean-spirited and divisive speeches by an American president in history. 


REAL CLEAR POLITICS: Media Exaggerates Democrat Election Chances

Liberal media downplayed Biden's failures on the economy and his inability to unite the country. Democrats should pay the price in the midterm elections.

Read the rest of the Fox News article...

Follow David Bossie on Twitter

Read more from David Bossie on Fox News


JUST THE NEWS: President of Citizens United slams Biden for labeling those who didn't vote for him 'semi-fascist'

Citizens United President Dave Bossie called out President Joe Biden on "Just the News, Not Noise," for calling those who voted for Donald Trump "semi-fascist."

"Joe Biden's out there calling every Republican in the country and the 75 million people who voted for Donald Trump semi-fascist," said Bossie. "This is a disgusting display of partisanship from a guy who got elected by claiming he was going to be a uniter."

Bossie said that the Republicans' response to this should be to get out and vote in the upcoming 2022 midterm elections to stop the "left-wing onslaught."

"In order for America to recover, we have to have Republicans elected this November," Bossie stated.

Bossie explained that Republicans need to get their messaging across for the midterms and get votes to take back some control.

"Republicans better return to message very, very quickly," Bossie warned. "Your average American doesn't pay attention to elections until post Labor Day. But we have plenty of time."

Bossie believes the Inflation Reduction Act will backfire on Biden in the upcoming midterms.

"This lunacy that Joe Biden has pushed, is not going to help anything," Bossie said in reference to the Inflation Reduction Act. "If anything, it's going to harm the economy."

Bossie explained that another mistake Biden is making is demonizing the MAGA movement.

MAGA just means "Make America Great Again," Bossie explained. "And that's what the Democrats don't want. They hate America. They don't want America to be great again. They want to fundamentally transform America into a socialist nation."


JUST THE NEWS: Citizens United sues Biden admin for records on election executive order

Citizens United filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department and the Interior Department for records relating to President Joe Biden's "Executive Order on Promoting Access to Voting."

The conservative nonprofit submitted a FOIA request to the agencies on June 16 but did not receive a response within 20 working days as required, Citizens United stated.

The group on Thursday said the lawsuit seeks "records relating to Biden's Democrat Voter Turnout Executive Order that politicizes the federal workforce and is a blatant abuse of power that needs much more transparency."

Citizens United is concerned that the Biden administration may have violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits executive branch employees from engaging in certain types of political activity, through the executive order.

"These records should provide the answer," Citizens United President David Bossie told The Federalist.

The executive order, which was criticized by Republicans, directed all federal agencies to work on expanding voter registration and participation.

"Citizens United filed these FOIA lawsuits against the Interior & State Departments because Joe Biden’s executive order on voting amounts to a Democrat turnout effort that politicizes the federal workforce and is a blatant abuse of power," Bossie said. "This issue deserves far more transparency and that’s why we’re demanding these records be released to the American people."


  You are viewing Page: 1 of 75
    
Subscribe RSS

Latest Updates

CU v. Department of Commerce FOIA Lawsuit (2020 Census)

CU v. Department of Commerce FOIA Lawsuit (2020 Census)

CU and CUF sign on to amicus brief in Parents Defending Education v. Linn-Mar Community School District in support of appellant and reversal.

CU and CUF sign on to amicus brief in Parents...

CU-CUF-TPC File New Amicus Brief In Michigan Election Integrity Case

The public interest favors transparency in elections. Transparency promotes confidence...

CU Releases Polling In MI & NY

POLITICO: "FIRST IN PLAYBOOK, via Zach Montellaro: Here’s a first...

CU In The News

DAILY CALLER: GOP Senators Urge McConnell To Block Massive Spending Package

Four Senate Republicans on Wednesday urged Mitch McConnell to block...

LAW 360: Citizens United Asks High Court To Can ICE Curbs

Conservative nonprofit Citizens United has urged the U.S. Supreme Court...

THE DAILY SIGNAL: Congressmen, Conservative Groups Defend Eagle Forum From Justice Department’s ‘Chilling’ Subpoena

All six Republicans representing Alabama in the U.S. House signed...

FOX BUSINESS: US back to ‘Jimmy Carter economic policies’ as inflation rages, David Bossie says

During his appearance on "Varney & Co." Thursday, Citizens United...
Thank You, President Trump. Citizens United for the Trump Agenda

© 2021 - Citizens United - 202-547-5420
1006 Pennsylvania Ave SE - Washington, DC 20003
Privacy Policy